A "Judge Group" is a collection of judges which can be used in one or more events or divisions. Every event must be in one and only one judge group. For example, you might have a group of judges that can judge either the novice or open divisions of policy, a second judge group exclusively for congress judges, and a third group of judges which could judge any other IE event.
It may seem odd to set up your judge groups before setting up your events - just remember that a single group of judges may be used across multiple events, but a single event will only ever pull from a single judge group.
Note that a Judge GROUP is different than a Judge POOL - Judge Pools are used to draw from a specific subset of judges in the larger judge group - for example, only the judges that are still obligated for the semi-finals.
Creating A Judge Group
To create a Judge Group, click the "Add New Judge Group" link in the sidebar. After filling out the information shown below on the "Register" tab, click "Save Registration Settings." Previously created judge groups will appear in the sidebar:
After creating or selecting a judge group from the sidebar, you'll see a list of tabs with the settings for that judge group:
Each of these tabs is explained in more detail below.
The Register tab contains the general settings for the judge group as well as options related to how schools register their judges:
Name - This is just the name of the judge group. Should usually be something like "Policy" or "Individual Events."
Suppress judge codes (names only) - When checked, judges will appear on schematics and registration information with their names, instead of a judge code like "733." The majority of tournaments use this option, to avoid needing to explain to judges how to match up their judge code with their name.
Start judge codes with - Lets you set a prefix for the judge codes in this group, like "POL" for policy judges, so that you would have judges codes like "POL356" or "LD229" instead of just numbers.
Publish the list of judges online - Controls whether the list of registered judges will be available on your tournament's public website.
Ask for judge phone #s at registration - When checked, registering schools will be asked to provide phone numbers for their judges. This can make it much easier for the tournament to get in touch with judges when they go missing, forget to turn in a ballot, etc.
Ask for judge qualifications and histories - This option will ask registering schools to provide a short description of each judge's qualifications and judging history. Note that this is separate from and in addition to the normal judge Paradigms.
Abbreviation, max 3 letters: - This abbreviation will be used in various places throughout Tabroom to make things easier to read and make printouts align better, etc. It's recommended you set an abbreviation for each judge group.
Registrants can mark first year outs - When checked, registering schools will be given the option of marking a judge as a "first year out," i.e. that it's their first year judging. You can then use other options in the Judge Group and Event settings to make first-year judges free strikes, prevent them from seeing certain events/divisions, etc.
Registrants can mark neutral judges - Registering schools will be able to mark judges they enter as "neutral," which means that they are allowed to judge their own school's entries. This can be useful when schools bring judges to the tournament who aren't actually affiliated with their program and do no coaching, so would not normally be considered "constrained" from judging that school.
Allow judge double-entry - This lets schools enter judges in multiple events. You should only enable this option if you're sure about what you're doing and that your schedule contains no overlap - otherwise it's very easy to find yourself with double-scheduled judges that can't actually be in two places at once.
Require judges to have linked accounts (Online ballots only). - This will force all judges to have their judge entries "linked" to a tabroom account, which is necessary for Online Ballots to function correctly.
Ask to specify an alternate group - This will ask the registering school to provide an "alternate" group for the judge, so that you can move judges into their "second choice" judge group if necessary, for example to even out judge numbers between events.
Further down the page, you can configure the method used to compute judge obligations for entries. Note that you have two "methods" of computing judge obligations. You can choose "Entries per judge owed," which requires that a school bring 1 judge per X number of entries, such as 1 judge per 5 students in an Individual Event. Or, you can choose "Rounds owed per entry," which is the number of rounds of judging a school has to bring to "cover" each entry. You probably only want one or the other.
Entries per judge owed - Enter a value here if you want to require one judge for a certain number of entries in the events in this judge group. This is usually used in Individual Events, not Debate events.
Rounds owed per entry - Enter the number of rounds of judging required to "cover" each entry. This is the method normally used for Debate events.
Penalty per missing round: - This is the dollar amount a school will be fined for each round "under" their judging commitment. Note that this will not apply to tournament hired judges, and it will print a warning to that effect.
Fee for a judge to attend: - How much each school will be charged per judge they bring. This doesn't apply to tournament hired judges.
Once you have entered a value for one of the judge burden methods and save your settings, the Alter Burdens section will change:
Forgive judge burden for drops - If a school drops an entry after the tournament starts, this will reduce their judge commitment by the appropriate amount. Otherwise, their judges will still be obligated as if the entry wasn't dropped.
Maximum rounds for one judge - This lets you prevent a judge from seeing more than a proscribed number of rounds. Most useful at tournaments where you have way more than enough judging and want to ensure the judging is equitably distributed among a large pool.
Free rounds: reduce total burden by - This will reduce a schools overall judging burden by a set amount, for example if you have a large number of hired judges that will be "free" to the tournament.
You can also add a message at the bottom that will appear when schools register their judges - for example, you can use this to explain your tournaments policies about "first year out" judges, or what qualifications/experience a judge is expected to have.
The Hires tab is used to enable tournament-provided judging. If you don't plan to offer hired judging through the tournament, you can ignore this tab.
Hiring Exchange (Schools hire tourn-approved judges directly) - This will enable a "Hiring Exchange" for your tournament. Judges will then be able to "offer" hired rounds of judging, (see the section on Judging), and schools registering will be able to "claim" offered rounds via the website, without you needing to intervene or manage the judges yourself.
Offer tournament hired judging - Unlike the Hiring Exchange, which lets judges and schools match up judging themselves, this option enables offering judging provided directly by the tournament.
Number of hired rounds available. Put 0 to manage hires manually. - This is the total number of hired rounds you want to make available for registrants to request. If you put a 0, you will have to approve each hired judging request manually.
Charge per round - Dollar amount that a school will be charged per round of judging that it hires.
The Tabbing section controls most of the options for how judges are placed in rounds for events within the judge group, as well as some settings for ballot entry methods and MPJ weights.
Note that some of these options can be changed during the tournament. So for example, if you wanted to alter your MPJ weights later in the tournament to adjust how important "saving pref" is in the algorithm, you can make the adjustment before pairing the next round.
The "Pairing settings" section has options about how judges are placed in rounds:
Prevent back to back rounds - Stops a judge from receiving a ballot in consecutive rounds. In tight judge pools or when using MPJ, you probably want to leave this unchecked, since you don't want to artificially burn commitment or lower the average pref in the round unnecessarily.
Judges can get the same event twice - For judge groups with multiple events (such as one judge group for all IE's), this option will let a judge see multiple rounds in the same event.
Allow panels w/same school judges - For rounds with more than one judge (e.g. elims or paneled IE rounds), this will allow more than one judge from the same school on the panel.
Randomize judge assignments* - By default, in multi-event judge groups, Tabroom will prefer judges whose schools have more entries in that category. Check this to disable this preference
Diversity-enhanced judge placement - This will allow judges to self identify as "Diverse," and then will use the associated MPJ weight for "diverse judging" to attempt to place more "diverse" judges.
Tab confirms round starts (NDT method) - This option means that the tabroom will confirm each round has started, rather than a judge marking the round started on an online ballot.
MPJ Placement Weights
This section controls the "weights" used to compute mutually preferred judging scores. For example, it allows you to control whether the judge placement algorithm privileges "mutuality" more than "preference" or how important it is to try and "save" committed judges for later rounds.
These numbers are not "percentages," per se - they don't need to sum up to 100. Instead, they are "weighting factors" which are relative to one another.
The following explanation is somewhat technical - if you're not sure how to assign or tweak the MPJ weights, you can just use the default values.
The way MPJ works is by testing out each judge in each round, and computing a "score" for how well that judge fits. Tabroom will then try and find the mix of judges that gives the overall "best" combined score across all debates.
For each round/judge pair, the "score" is computed as the sum of: 1) The difference in mutuality (e.g. in a tiered system a 2-2 = 0, a 1-2 = 1, etc., for ordinals, a 46-38 = 8, a 23-28 = 5, etc), multiplied by the "Penalize non-mutual matches" weight. 2) The total preference (e..g a 1-1 = 2, 2-2 = 4, or with ordinals, a 25-35 = 60), multiplied by the "Penalize low-preferred matches" weight. 3) The likelihood a round of commitment will be lost, raised to the power of the "Avoid burning commitments early" weight. Note that this is an exponent, not a simple multiplication, so this number will likely be much lower than the other weights. 4) The average pref of the judge for all entries, minus the standard deviation of their pref from the average pref of the judge group, multiplied by the "Prefer hard-to-place judges" weight. 5) If in use, adds the "Promote use of diverse judging" weight for "diverse" judges. 6) If used, will increase the score for a Hired judge by the "Prefer hired judges over obligated" weight.
Put in terms of the options on the page:
Penalize non-mutual matches - This weight gets multiplied by the difference in mutuality between the two team's rating for the judge
Penalize low-preferred matches - This weight gets multiplied by the total preference, i.e. the sum of the two team's rating for the judge
Avoid burning commitments early - The likelihood a round of commitment will be lost by placing a judge is raised to this power. Note that this is an exponent, not a simple multiplication, so this number will likely be much lower than the other weights.
Prefer hard-to-place judges - This weight is multiplied by the average pref of the judge, minus the standard deviation of their pref from the average pref of the judge group.
Promote use of diverse judging - This weight control how important the use of "diverse" judges is in the final score.
Prefer hired judges over obligated - This weight is added to hired judges to make it more likely they will be placed than
Stand-in rating for non-preffed judges: - This is not a "weight" used in the MPJ algorithim, but instead is the value used for judges who were not given a pref by a team. For example, if a team only filled out a partial pref sheet, you could choose whether you wanted unranked judges to be a "1" or some other number.
The built-in defaults should work fine for most situations. If you're so inclined, Palmer has this to say about his usual personal defaults for tiered MPJ systems:
- Penalize non-mutual matches = 65
- Penalize low-preferred matches = 20
- Avoid burning commitments early = 5 (8 if in a very tight judging situation)
- Prefer hard-to-place judges = 10
For ordinal preference systems, the following weights work well:
- Penalize non-mutual matches = 25
- Penalize low-preferred matches = 10
- Avoid burning commitments early = 7 (8 if in a very tight judging situation)
- Prefer hard-to-place judges = 10
If you wonder at some point why it placed judge X instead of judge Y, you can look at an individual round (by clicking on the room number on the schematic), and then click "Judge Pref Report" on the sidebar. This will show you the judge score for all available judges in the debate, so you can see how you could change the weights to achieve a different goal.
For example, if you were getting a lot of 3-3 pref matchups, and would prefer more 1-2's (i.e. increase pref at the expense of mutuality), you could turn down the "Penalize non-mutual matches" score to 50.
Tabulation Settings is where you configure options for how ballots are entered for events in this judge group.
Ballot Entry Method - Choose which method to use for confirming/double-checking ballot entry. Your choices are:
- "Enter twice; 2nd must match" - each ballot must be entered twice before showing as complete (preferably by two different people, to prevent mistakes).
- "Visual scan with confirmation" - After entering a ballot, you will be shown a review of your entered data and asked to confirm it.
- "Live dangerously; no required double-check - This option will mark a ballot as completed after a single entry, though you can still double-enter them if you wish, and will be notified of any mismatch.
Show school codes on ballot entry - This controls whether the ballot entry screen contains the school code or not.
IE Master Ballot style - For ballots in Individual Events, this controls the "style" of ballot that's used for events in this judge group. You can choose options with various combinations of the Name, Title, School Code, Entry Code, or First Names.
The bottom of the "Tabbing" tab contains places for 2 messages:
Message for judge assignment sheet - This will be included on all judge assignment sheets, and is a good place for communicating information or judge policies to the entire judge group.
Message about diversity policy - If you're making use of "diversity enhanced judging," then you can include the text of your policy on judging diversity here.
The Ratings tab is used to configure mutually preferred judging. If you're not using MPJ for the events in a judge group, you can ignore it. Note that a few MPJ-related options (such as the MPJ placement weights) are found on other tabs.
For a general overview of how mutually preferred judging works, and the differences between "tiers" or "ordinal" approaches, you can click the "Guide to Prefs on Tabroom.com" link on the Tabroom sidebar. This section of the manual will presume you have at least a basic familiarity with the concept of MPJ.
If you want to configure a deadline for judge registration in a judge group which is earlier than the general tournament registration deadline (for example to allow for extra time for registrants to complete prefs), you can set it here:
You can also choose when prefs will open and close for schools to enter their rankings. Usually, you want to set the prefs to open after the judge registration deadline, so that you don't have people fill out partial pref sheets and miss changes to the judge pool. You'll also want to set the prefs to close with enough time that you can pair any preset rounds well in advance of the first round.
This section contains general settings for how people fill our their pref sheets:
Judge obligation must be met to pref/rate - When set, a school must have entered enough judges to meet their judging obligation before their pref sheet will be available to fill out.
Ask for judge paradigms during registration - When entering judges, the school will be asked to provide a paradigm if one doesn't already exist for that judge.
Judges may self-identify as diversity enhancing - This will give judges the option of checking a box that they self-identify as "diverse." This information can then be used for "diversity enhanced judge placement" as described above.
Free Strikes don't meet judge obligations - Sometimes, judges are marked as a "free strike," for example when setting all first-year judges to be a free strike, or when manually making a judge a free strike because they were registered late, etc. This option will mean that a judge marked as a free strike does not count towards a school's total judge obligation.
First year out judges are free strikes - This is most useful when used in concert with the "Registratns can mark first year outs" option on the Tabbing tab. It will then make all judges marked as a first year a free strike.
Do not pref free strikes - If a judge is a free strike, they won't appear on the pref sheet.
Conflicts, Strikes, and MPJ Method
The rest of the page contains settings for what method of MPJ to use, and how strikes and conflicts should be handled.
Enter conflicts separately - This will let people filling out a pref sheet mark conflicts separately, instead of as a category on the pref sheet.
Include conflicts in ordinals' denominator - This determines whether conflicts "count" towards a judges ordinal percentile, which affects how much a team is "penalized" for having a large number of conflicts relative to the size of the judge group.
Pref Method - This is where you select which method to use for MPJ. Your options are:
- MPJ Tiers (by whole judge) - You can configure any number of tiers, usually 4, 6, or 9, and each judge will count equally toward the tier quota
- MPJ Tiers (by round) - Same as previous, except tier quotas are counted by rounds of judging instead, which means a judge that's only in for 1 round counts for less towards the quota than a judge in for a full commitment.
- MPJ Ordinals - Each judge will be ranked in order from 1 (best) to however many judges there are in the judge group.
- Community Ratings - Judges will be given a "community" rating rather than a tier, such as "Experienced Judge" or "Parent Judge."
- Whole Number Caps (NDT Elims) - Registrants will need to mark a certain number of judges as "preffered" or "strike." Most useful in concert with judge strike cards, such as used for the elims of the National Debate Tournament.
Extra 1s = less 2s, etc - If enabled, judges placed in higher tiers in excess of that tier's quota will reduce the number required in the tier below by the same amount. For example. If you need ten 1's and ten 2's, then marking eleven 1's would mean only nine 2's were required.
School-wide strikes/scratches - Gives a pre-determined number of strikes to each school, that applies to all their entries. Note that this is in addition to any other "tier" you have configured as a strike.
Per-entry strikes/scratches - Gives each entry a pre-determined number of strikes. Note that this is in addition to any other "tier" you have configured as a strike, so it is usually best not to set up a separate strike tier.
Ask coaches to rate their judges - When registering a judge, the school will be asked to provide a rating for them. This would then be used instead of a traditional strike card.
Use tab room ratings - Allows the tournament to rate all judges for the purposes of MPJ, rather than having pref ratings entered by individual registrants. Tab ratings can then be set in Entries - Judges - Judge Ratings.
This tab will appear after you have selected an MPJ method on the Ratings tab which requires you to configure tiers. The exact name of the tab will differ depending on which method you chose.
For example, if you choose the MPJ Tiers (By whole round) method, you'll see an "MPJ Tiers" tab, that allows you to add tiers by specifying a name and a minimum and maximum percentage. After entering each tier, you can continue using the "New" row to add additional tiers:
Note that if you want to use the "cumulative prefs" method where more judges in a higher tier reduce the number required in the next tier, you must make sure your tiers are named with numbers, like "1," "2," etc.
For each tier, you must set a minimum and maximum percentage of judges that must be in each tier. You can also set a tier as the default, as well as specify that a tier should be considered a constraint (usually the next to last tier), or a strike (usually the last tier). For example, one possible setup for a 6 tier system would look like this:
The Part-timers tab is how you configure time blocks that coaches can mark judges as unavailable for. For example, some tournaments have a large number of judges who can only come on one day of the tournament, so it helps to let coaches mark someone as "Unavailable Friday."
Note that you can always manually add a "Time Strike" for a judge in Entries - Judges, which will also prevent them from being scheduled for a round during that period. The Part-timers tab is used to allow registering schools to do this themselves, and optionally to charge them if they are under their judging commitment during a time block.
To create a new time block, add a Name, Fee (if desired), then choose the day of the tournament and a Start/End time for the block. You can choose whether to create a block for each round, one for AM/PM, or one for ecah day, for example.
Important Note - The name of your time block should be something like "No Round 1" or "Unavailable Sunday." Otherwise, people registering will frequently mistake these time blocks for times the judge IS available, rather than times they are NOT, and you will have judges marked as "unavailable" during all time blocks.
The fee you enter will only be levied if the schools total available judging during that time block falls under their commitment. For example, if a school owes 2 judges on Friday but only 1 is available, they would be charged the fine for that blocks. But if they owed 2 judges and brought 3, only 2 of whom were available on Friday, no fine would be charged.
A judge "pool" is a subset of judges in the larger judge group that will be available for a certain round. The use of judge pools is not required, but it can make your life easier. For example. you can create a judge pool for each elim round and then automatically populate it with only the judges that are still obligated.
You can either create judge pools under Settings - Judges - <Judge Group> - Pools, or under Paneling - Judges - Pools. Both are actually the same page.
To create a pool, enter a name, and choose whether the pool is only for Standby judges, whether to Publish the list of judges online (for example, to provide a list of judges obligated for the next elim), and whether registering schools can mark judges for certain pools:
To delete a judge pool after creating it, just click the red X.
Once you have created the pools you plan to use, you have to add judges to them by going to Paneling - Judges - Pool Judges. You can then either add judges to the pool manually by clicking on their name (they'll turn blue if they're in the pool), or use the "Auto-populate" section of the sidebar to add in judges that are obligated in a particular debate:
You must also assign the pool you want to use to the relevant round(s). You can do this on the main schedule under Settings - Schedule, or under Paneling - Judges - Event Settings:
For more information, see the section on Schedule.